Hey everyone! Since I got asked a few times about dick ratings this fall (they seem to be getting more popular, and seem to be something subscribers expect OnlyFans girls to be offering), I want to say a few words about them. Short version: I don't do them. Long version: I don't do them because I don't... believe in them, for lack of a better word? 😅 Every dick rating I would give to someone would be some variation of the following: "Well it looks like a penis, and I guess compared to others it's big/average/small, but that doesn't even matter because it says nothing about what you're like in bed, so it doesn't matter what it looks like. Have a great day 😊". And I could never rate anyone a number out of 10 on that basis. The honest truth is that the appearance or size of your dick matters very little in the context of how attractive you are to women you might get to know/end up having sex with. If a woman's genuinely attracted to you, likes you, and is in a situation where she wants sex with you, the appearance of your dick will not stand in the way. Unless your dick is *exceptionally* big, or *exceptionally* small, the size doesn't make that much of a difference during sex, and there is a huge spectrum between those extremes! If you think your dick is 'small', the odds are it's probably on the average side of dicks. Don't forget that mainstream porn pretty much exclusively casts men with big to very big dicks. Yes, big dicks sure feel BIGGER during penetrative sex, which is nice; but they also take more getting used to, and are more likely to hurt a woman by accident, which is extremely uncomfortable and the opposite of sexy. The kind of rough sex I love the most is hardly doable with someone with a *huge* dick because of this; meanwhile someone with a more average-sized dick doesn't have to hold himself back like that and be careful like that. So there's definitely an upside and downside to sex with men with big dicks, which sexually active guys with big dicks are mostly aware of; life isn't like mainstream porn. More importantly, just having a big dick doesn't make any man automatically good at sex (compatible with what their partner is looking for during sex), which brings me back to why I think dick ratings are so fundamentally pointless. All dicks kind of look like dicks, in the end. Women can't see them during sex anyway. Over the years the topic has come up in conversations between me and straight or bi female friends or fellow models often. Generally speaking, we're not turned on by the visuals of them (so please for the love of all that is holy, do not send disembodied dick pics to women who didn't ask for them!). We're turned on imagining a whole *situation* involving a dick and the entire guy who belongs to it (who we are ALREADY attracted to). When I get a dick pic sent to me against my will I'm automatically annoyed by it and close it immediately; it makes no difference if that's a 9 inch, perfectly straight, well groomed, for all intents and purposes 'nice' dick that would get a 9/10 rating from a sex worker if the guy bought a rating. I'm already turned off by that hypothetical guy because he's clearly someone without manners or respect for me (or else he wouldn't show me his penis out of the blue). Then, I don't know what the rest of him looks like or what he acts like in real life. How could the appearance of his dick be able to overcome all that annoyance and the feeling of having my boundaries violated? Of course it can't. As you can tell I'm having a hard time really putting into words why I reject dick ratings (and the money that comes with them, of course) considering they're something that many guys want to get/buy/read. I guess I just consider them fundamentally dishonest. Sure this job is always a performance and an expression of fantasy to a certain extent, and more power to all the girls who make thousands of dollars off of dick ratings alone, giving guys a number based purely on their appearance and saying they e.g. want to suck their dick on the basis of what it looks like because that's part of the 'dick rating' service, without knowing anything else about the guy -- but I, PERSONALLY, just can't get on board with that. I can't abandon what I consider facts in order to appeal to a guy's fantasy: the fantasy that the LOOK AND SIZE of his dick in and of itself are that important. I firmly do not think the appearance of your dick matters so much to potential sex partners that you should assign some numeric value to it, and over that number or assessment possibly forget that even if a sex worker gives you a great rating based on size and some other outward characteristics, you, like everybody who has sex, still really should be communicative, passionate, ready to learn, hygienic, compatible with your partner's wishes, and all those other lovely things that ACTUALLY make someone good at sex. Example that hopefully makes my point clearer: In real life, having sex with a guy whose big dick WOULD get a 10/10 rating from OF girls based on its appearance, but who won't eat me out, cums after 3 minutes and falls asleep, doesn't care about what I want, is only into vanilla sex; screw that, I don't want that, no matter if he has a 'nice dick', dick size/appearance doesn't matter like that. I don't see the point in pretending that it does just to make some extra money.